Get notified of page updates
Education > XRAY > Search Results

FORCE's eXamining the Relevance of Articles for You (XRAY) program looks behind the headlines of cancer news to help you understand what the research means for you. XRAY is a reliable source of hereditary cancer research-related news and information.
Learn more about the XRAY program

How To Use XRAY
Search by Topic Submit an Article for Review

Categories Cancer Risk

111 through 120 of 131

Relevance: Medium

Strength of Science: Medium

View Related Clinical Trials

Study : Breast cancer screening should be tailored to a woman’s risk factors and breast density

Relevance: Medium

Strength of Science: Medium

View Related Clinical Trials

Most relevant for: Women who are at high risk for breast cancer due to family history, dense breasts, LCIS, or multiple biopsies

The United States Preventative Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommends a screening mammogram every other year for women ages 50-74 who are at average risk for breast cancer. But do all patients in this category benefit from this screening regimen? 10/18/16

Read More

Relevance: Medium-High

Strength of Science: Medium

Research Timeline: Post Approval

View Related Clinical Trials

Study : Rare mutations in PALB2, CHEK2, and ATM: how much do they increase cancer risk?

Relevance: Medium-High

Strength of Science: Medium

Research Timeline: Post Approval

View Related Clinical Trials

Most relevant for: People who tested positive for one of the rare variants in CHEK2, ATM or PALB2 that are covered in this study

As multi-gene panel tests become more common, people are discovering they have mutations in genes that are not understood as well as BRCA. This can make it difficult to give patients accurate assessments of their cancer risk. For example, mutations in PALB2, CHEK2, and ATM are rare, but some specific changes in these genes are even less common. The goal of this international collaboration was to better understand the cancer risks of some very rare PALB2, CHEK2, and ATM mutations. The findings are relevant only to the specific mutations covered in this paper and do not apply to all people with mutations in PALB2, CHEK2, or ATM. (9/27/16)

Read More

Relevance: Medium

Strength of Science: Medium-High

View Related Clinical Trials

Study : Does IVF increase a woman’s risk for breast cancer?

Relevance: Medium

Strength of Science: Medium-High

View Related Clinical Trials

Most relevant for: Woman at average risk for breast cancer who have or are considering undergoing In Vitro Fertilization

In vitro fertilization (IVF) wasn't commonly used until the 1980s, so its long-term effects are mostly unknown. A new study suggests that the treatment does not increase a woman's risk for developing breast cancer. (8/23/16)

Read More

Relevance: Medium

Strength of Science: Medium

Research Timeline: Human Research

View Related Clinical Trials

Study : Early research on a drug to prevent breast cancer

Relevance: Medium

Strength of Science: Medium

Research Timeline: Human Research

View Related Clinical Trials

Most relevant for: Women with a BRCA1 mutation

Many researchers are interested in non-surgical options to reduce the higher-than-average risk of developing breast cancer in BRCA mutation carriers. This research study identified a type of drug, called a “RANK ligand inhibitor,” that may prevent breast cancer. Among mice that were genetically engineered to have no BRCA1 genes, those that were given the drug developed tumors less frequently than those that did not. While this is an exciting early study for BRCA mutation carriers, more work and human clinical trials need to be done before this can be used as a prevention therapy in humans. (7/12/16)

Update added 11/24/19: The RANK ligand inhibitor, denosumab is currently being studied as a possible breast and ovarian cancer preventive agent in human clinical trials.

Read More

Relevance: Medium

Strength of Science: Medium

Research Timeline: Human Research

View Related Clinical Trials

Study : Breast cancer risk model updated for average risk women with genetic, lifestyle and environmental information

Relevance: Medium

Strength of Science: Medium

Research Timeline: Human Research

View Related Clinical Trials

Most relevant for: Women at average risk for breast cancer

A number of factors are known to increase breast cancer risk, but some of these factors have not been included in models to predict breast cancer risk. This study looks at an updated model that includes some of these factors, such as genetics, smoking, and drinking. The goal of the model is to give women a more individualized breast cancer risk assessment. (6/29/16)

Read More

Relevance: Medium-High

Strength of Science: Medium

View Related Clinical Trials

Study : Does light alcohol consumption affect your breast cancer risk?

Relevance: Medium-High

Strength of Science: Medium

View Related Clinical Trials

Most relevant for: Women who drink alcohol and are concerned about their breast cancer risk.

Alcohol is known to increase breast cancer risk, but does that include light consumption? This study indicates that some breast cancer occurrences and mortality is due to light alcohol consumption. (06/21/16)

Read More

Relevance: Medium-High

Strength of Science: Medium-High

Research Timeline: Human Research

View Related Clinical Trials

Study : Dense breast notifications are informative but hard to read and understand

Relevance: Medium-High

Strength of Science: Medium-High

Research Timeline: Human Research

View Related Clinical Trials

Most relevant for: Women with dense breast tissue on mammograms

Some states offer women dense breast notifications that are meant to explain that dense breasts are risk factors for breast cancer and can hide cancer on mammograms, and to identify appropriate supplemental screening options. But recent research found that this information is often not easy to read or understand, which questions the usefulness of the documents. (6/7/16)

Read More

Relevance: Medium

Strength of Science: Medium

Research Timeline: Human Research

View Related Clinical Trials

Study : Is breast cancer risk increased in women who test negative for the BRCA mutation in their family?

Relevance: Medium

Strength of Science: Medium

Research Timeline: Human Research

View Related Clinical Trials

Most relevant for: Women from a family with a known BRCA mutation who tested negative for the mutation in the family

Some women who do not carry a BRCA mutation, but come from a BRCA-positive family, still develop breast cancer. This research examines whether these women are at higher risk for breast cancer, or whether their risk is similar to women in the general population. (4/19/16)

Read More

Relevance: Medium

Quality of Writing: Medium-Low

View Related Clinical Trials

Article : New York Times report demonstrates need for genetic counseling, but doesn’t give the whole story

Relevance: Medium

Quality of Writing: Medium-Low

View Related Clinical Trials

Most relevant for: People diagnosed with breast cancer

A New York Times report discussed how genetic testing could provide “grim data” without guidance for patients. While this is a valid concern, this report does not sufficiently emphasize certain important issues regarding genetic testing, particularly the need for genetic counseling by a health care provider with expertise in genetics before and after genetic testing. (4/5/16)

Read More

Relevance: Medium-High

Strength of Science: High

View Related Clinical Trials

Study : BRCA testing in young women with breast cancer

Relevance: Medium-High

Strength of Science: High

View Related Clinical Trials

Most relevant for: Young women diagnosed with breast cancer who have not yet had genetic testing

National guidelines recommend genetic testing for BRCA mutations in young women who are diagnosed with breast cancer. However, little is known about how women decide to get testing, or how they use genetic information to decide on treatment options. This study found that genetic testing is increasing among young breast cancer survivors, and it explores some of the factors that play into patients’ decision making about genetic testing. (3/22/16)

Read More