Get notified of page updates

Study: Disparities in research impact breast screening guidelines

For women at average risk of breast cancer, the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) currently recommends beginning annual breast cancer screening at age 50. However, because these guidelines are largely based on data from white women, they may not be sensitive to racial differences.  A new study assesses the age distribution of breast cancer cases across race/ethnicity in the U.S. (6/21/18)

Glossary on
off

Contents

At a glance                  Questions for your doctor
Findings               In-depth                
Clinical trials Limitations
Guidelines Resources


STUDY AT A GLANCE

This study is about:

the age distribution of breast cancer diagnoses across race/ethnicity in the United States.

Why is this study important?

Breast cancer screening recommendations are based on data that is predominantly from white women.  Because of this, the authors of this study hypothesize that current screening guidelines may not be sensitive to racial differences. This could result in underscreening of nonwhite women.

Study findings: 

The data in this study was obtained from U.S. cancer registries for female patients who were diagnosed with breast cancers from January 1, 1973 through December 31, 2010.  Data included race, age at diagnosis and .

For the 747,763 female patients included in this study:

  • Overall, median age at diagnosis was 58 years, but varied among racial groups:
    • White women: 59 years
    • Hispanic American women: 55 years
    • African American women: 56 years
    • Asian American women: 56 years
  • A higher proportion of nonwhite patients were diagnosed with breast cancer before age 50. The percentage of patients diagnosed before age 50 varied between races:
    • African Americans: 31%
    • Hispanic Americans: 35%
    • Asian Americans: 32.8%
    • White Americans: 23.6%  
  • A higher proportion of African American and Hispanic women had more advanced breast cancer at the time of diagnosis than white and Asian American women.

What does this mean for me?

Current USPTF guidelines are based primarily on data for white women and are designed to detect breast cancer early. 

The findings of the study do not question current screening recommendations. The findings of this study show that the age of breast cancer occurrence is different for different ethnicities with the youngest occurrence in African American women. Because of these findings the current ethnicity blind recommendations may need to be re-evaluated.

Women of color were diagnosed with breast cancer at a younger age than white women.  Because breast cancer diagnosis in white patients peaks at age 60, the screening recommendation is to begin annual screening at age 50.  If the same USPSTF screening initiation/early detection window (10 years prior to peak of breast cancer diagnosis) is applied to these new data, African American and Asian women should begin screening at age 47 and Hispanic women at 46.

Under the Patient Protection Affordable Care Act, USPSTF Guidelines can impact insurance coverage for preventive services. However, in the case of breast screening, legislation known as the PALS Act supercedes the USPSTF Guidelines by requiring health insurance companies to cover annual for women starting at age 40. 

Posted 6/21/18

Share your thoughts on this XRAY review by taking our brief survey.
 

References

Stapleton SM, Oseni TO, MD; Bababekov YJ and Hung Y-C. Race/Ethnicity and Age Distribution of Breast Cancer Diagnosis in the United States. JAMA Surg. 2018. 153 (6):594-595.

Monticciolo DL, Newell MS, Moy L, Niell B, Monsees B, Sickles EA. Breast Cancer Screening in Women at Higher-Than-Average Risk: Recommendations From the ACR J Am Coll Radiol. 2018. 15(3 Pt A):408-414.

U.S. Preventative Services Task Force: Breast Cancer Screening.  Release Date January 2016.
 

Disclosure

FORCE receives funding from industry sponsors, including companies that manufacture cancer drugs, tests and devices. All XRAYS articles are written independently of any sponsor and are reviewed by members of our Scientific Advisory Board prior to publication to assure scientific integrity.

Expert Guidelines

The National Comprehensive Cancer Network breast screening guidelines recommend the following for women at average risk for breast cancer: 

  • ages 25-39: 
    • practice breast awareness
    • clinical breast exam every 1-3 years
    • risk assessment, including questions about family and personal medical history, should be done during clinical exams to find high-risk women who may need additional screening
  • ages 40 and older:
    • practice breast awareness
    • yearly clinical breast exam
    • risk assessment, including questions about family and personal medical history, should be done during clinical exams to find high-risk women who may need additional screening
    • yearly mammogram –consider a , if available. 
  • The NCCN has a different set of guidelines for individuals who are  at increased risk for breast cancer.

Many other professional societies and organizations have breast cancer screening guidelines that differ slightly. They don't all agree on the starting age and frequency of mammogram screenings.

It is important to note, that all of the groups support the opportunity for women ages 40 to 49 to decide whether mammogram screening is right for them.

Updated: 02/05/2022

Questions To Ask Your Doctor

  • When should I begin routine breast cancer screening?
  • Which risk factors are considered in your breast screening recommendation?
  • Are there other risk factors I should be aware of?

Open Clinical Trials

The following clinical research studies focus on addressing in cancer:

Updated: 01/13/2025

Who covered this study?

VICE

Should doctors screen women of color for breast cancer even earlier This article rates 4.5 out of 5 stars

Modern Health Care

'Flawed science' may play a role in health disparities This article rates 3.5 out of 5 stars

The Harvard Gazette

Race bias seen in breast-cancer screening This article rates 3.5 out of 5 stars

How we rated the media