This blog will cover topics of interest that affect our community. Unless otherwise stated, the blog articles will be written by Sue Friedman, Executive Director of FORCE.

| More

Previvor: Past, Present, & Future

September 28, 2016

Note: In honor of National Previvor Day, I’ve updated this blog post, which was initially published in 2008 but is still relevant today. 

previvordayby Sue Friedman

Use of the term “previvor” has become common, which, in my opinion is good for our community. Since popularization of the term increases the chance that its meaning and origin can get lost or forgotten, a post on the origins and future of the term seems timely.

Not everyone loves the term, I can understand that. Sharing the history and reason why the term was coined can bring attention to, and provide insight into the important and unique situation and needs of people who are at very high risk for cancer.

The Early Days

In 1998, after finishing my treatment for breast cancer and after learning that I had a BRCA2 mutation, I sought out breast cancer support groups. Because of the hereditary component to my cancer, I felt that others in the group couldn’t relate to many of the issues I was facing. My needs were not entirely met by the standard cancer support group model. Along the way I met women who were high-risk because of a BRCA mutation or other risk factor but who did not have cancer. These women became my friends and inspiration; certainly they were facing difficult decisions and issues that most of their friends couldn’t understand or relate to. With a diagnosis of cancer I immediately joined an already well-established community (albeit one I didn’t want to belong to) and had instant access to support and resources. Sadly, I noticed that many of my new high-risk friends without cancer felt alone, and not comfortable with using resources and forums created specifically for people with a cancer diagnosis.

I founded FORCE in 1999 under the principle that nobody should face hereditary cancer alone. Our goal has always been to include all who have been affected by hereditary cancer: those with cancer and those without, those with a known mutation and those with cancer in the family, even if no mutation has been found. FORCE was also established to provide a home and safe haven specifically for high-risk people who had very few other safe and supportive places to share their common experiences.

The term “cancer pre-vivor” arose in 2000 from a challenge on the FORCE message board by Jordan, a website regular, who posted, “I need a label!” At that time I knew that the medical community had a label: the term “unaffected carrier” is used to describe those who have a gene mutation but have not had cancer. The term applies from a medical perspective, but can be dismissive for people who face the fears, stress, and difficult choices that accompany an increased risk for cancer. As a result, FORCE developed and promoted the term “cancer previvor” for “survivor of a predisposition to cancer.” The term applies to people regardless of their medical choices, surgery, surveillance, risk-reducing medication, or other; all people at high risk for cancer must face difficult decisions about risk management, and their consequences. Simply put, if you have not had cancer but know that you have a mutation that greatly increases your risk of cancer, or if you come from a family with a strong history of cancer but no mutation has been found then you are a previvor, and FORCE is here for you.

Previvor is chosen as #3 top buzzword of 2007

Previvor is chosen as #3 top buzzword of 2007

Growth of a Movement

Over the years the term previvor has been incorporated into the cancer lexicon. Due to the enthusiastic use by our community and the medical community’s lack of a better word, the term has slowly been accepted by the medical and research community. In December 2007, Time Magazine chose “previvor” as #3 of the top buzzwords of 2007 giving millions of people exposure to the term. And due to high-profile celebrities sharing their story about genetic testing, the term Previvor is now linked to famous names like Angelina Jolie.


And as the collective voice and power of the previvor community grows awareness, it also drives advances in prevention research, such as the WISP Trial which is looking at outcomes in women choosing to remove their fallopian tubes only and delay ovary removal, and a study examining whether the diabetes drug metformin can reduce breast cancer risk in high-risk women. Studies like these are only possible if we can motivate and mobilize people at high risk for cancer to participate in research.

The explosion of genetics technology has led to the discovery of many other genes that predispose people to cancer. As more people test positive for mutations in ATM, PALB2, CHEK2, BRIP1, or other genes associated with cancer risk, they need information and resources to make informed decisions about their health. This new generation of previvors face challenging medical decisions that are similar to, but yet distinct from people with BRCA mutations. They have an ongoing need for more research and support. In some ways, their situation is like the previvors I first met in 1999 when there was little awareness, research or support for people with a BRCA mutation. It is important that we embrace all members of the HBOC community and assure that they do not have to face hereditary cancer alone.

Previvorship for the Next Generation

Previvors face challenging medical decisions. Although we have the power to prevent some hereditary cancers, it is not enough. We have the technology to identify high-risk people and yet many people remain unaware of their risk until after a cancer diagnosis. The cost of genetic testing has gone down substantially, yet there are still barriers to genetic information and services for too many people. Risk-reducing surgery, although life-saving, is not what we want for future generations. We must continue to push for progress for the benefit of future generations of previvors.

In 2000 when the term was first coined, most previvors faced medical decisions in vacuum. Sixteen years later, the situation is better than it was, but we still have a lot of work left to do. Fortunately we have a large, strong, motivated, and and amazing community that is up for the challenge.

Be empowered and be well!





  1. Ellie Atkins says:

    I am a 70 year old BrCa2 “previvor” and survivor of lung cancer, 2 years cancer free.
    I am grateful to my genetics counselor for sending FORCE material to me.

    What we have been working on is finding a support group for women my age who are dealing with making hard choices, etc.,
    (i.e.prophylactic surgery vs. “wait and see”! )

    Surviving radical surgery is a big issue when other medical issues prevail!
    I’m interested in a group for seniors who share my concerns.

  2. Mercy says:

    I can’t believe I found a site that addresses what I have…a strong family history without the BRAC mutation. I have been looking for months!

  3. […] In the high-risk community, those who have a BRCA1 or 2 mutation, but who have never had cancer, are often known as “previvors.”  The word is derived from the phrase “survivor of a predisposition to cancer.”  The term seems to have caught on quite well; in fact, it was one of Time’s Top 10 Buzzwords in 2007.  For the uninitiated, Sue Friedman offers a thorough explanation of the term and its history over at …. […]

  4. […] from FORCE – Previvor: Past, Present, & Future Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)Previous Post Breast Cancer Awareness […]

  5. […] the term Previvor, and gave this important community of stakeholders a voice and a name, read the Previvor: Past, Present, and Future blog from 2008 and visit our previvor page on […]

  6. I am a previvor I chose to face my fears head on this year after losing my mother (young), aunt, and grandmother all to cancer. I was told multiple times by my doctor (one of the best in the industry) that I had great insurance and I was covered. I had surgery April 1, 2014. The very next morning I was awakened by my DR.’s PA she proceeded to tell me they were going to have to unhook me from my IV’s and they had just received a denial letter from my insurance (after surgery). I immediately started to sob. I was unhooked from everything waiting to be let go at any min the pain was horrible I was allowed 1 oxycodone every 4 hours. It was late into the day when I was told I could stay. I have some complications from the mastectomy/reconstruction that I am now seeing a wound facility for and awaiting approval for wound care. I received my hospital bill for $126,633 dollars this week for my 2 night stay. I am not BRAC positive but I as well as the rest of my mom’s family have Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome. I met with the geneticist that ran my odds of developing BC at 54%. Has anyone had something similar happen and could please give me your story or advice. Thank you so much!! Sheila

  7. Lindsay says:

    I just think it’s sad that over time the word has been claimed only by those who have had surgical treatment for their BRCA gene mutation. As if the word was made for one group. We should be sticking together through support and shared knowledge not knocking each other down… I think it’s important we get this out there more especially if we want to create a cohesive community. It saddens me to see those bullied for using the word who are pre-op or aren’t having the surgery. Like they aren’t previvors because they haven’t endured the surgery. Those people are still fighting, too.

    • Sue Friedman says:

      Hi Lindsay,
      Thanks for your comments. The word was created and applies to anyone facing hereditary cancer risk regardless of their decisions. We agree, we need to unite in order to advocate for more research, resources and better options!

  8. Michelle says:

    I am so happy to have found this website. I am scheduled for my prophylactic bilateral mastectomy with reconstruction surgery on July 11, 2017. I have been fighting this decision and feel very alone in it. I have been battling with masses, lumps, whatever you want to call them since 2009 and have had three lumpectomies so far; am being monitored every six months with MRI and 3D mammogram; fighting insurance because I am under 40 years of age; continue to has lumps pop up almost two months after one is removed and biopsied; and had genetic testing done (negative) but have significant history of breast cancer and am at high risk for developing breast cancer. My doctor told me that it is not a matter of if, but when. Since I made the decision for a mastectomy after being on Tamoxifen (horrific experience from this), I feel alone and as though those around me do not support me. I have had comments of why would you disfigure yourself…you don’t have cancer yet; you are overreacting; and you shouldn’t jump the gun. It has been a hard road and now one week before surgery I find this website and felt a peace and as though there was support out there…there were those that get me and understand. Thank you!!!

    • Sara Boyd Grant says:

      I just read your post…I am having my surgery this coming Monday! any pointers 🙂 I am having a bilateral mastectomy with reconstruction! I am a little anxious today, not sure why, except for the unknown I guess and I am a healthcare professional! I would love to hear of your post op experience etc.

Leave a Reply

Connect with others.

Call our Helpline

Our helpline offers peer support for people concerned about hereditary cancer. All calls are confidential. Call any time.

Join a Local Group

FORCE has outreach groups throughout the United States and in Essex, United Kingdom that meet periodically to offer peer support, and share resources.

FORCE:Facing Our Risk of Cancer Empowered